Become a Reviewer
Become a Reviewer
By reviewing, you play a vital role in advancing fair research practices, while earning well-deserved recognition for your contributions to the scientific community.
Ensure transparency and reproducibility in science.
Strengthen your academic profile with transparent peer review and commitment to reproducibility and open science.
Get additional benefits and discounts, like free Marble publlications.
By reviewing, you contribute to fair research assessment practices aligned with CoARA, DORA, and other global initiatives advocating for change.
Ensure transparency and reproducibility in science.
Strengthen your academic profile with recognized peer-review and commitment to reproducibility and open science.
Get an additional free RR reporting fee when signing up as a reviewer, and review regularly to earn credits and publish your own reports for free.
How to become a Reviewer
How to become a Reviewer
01
Complete the registration form below
02
Click the confirmation link in your e-mail to verify your identity
03
Start reviewing: receive Marbles aligned with your expertise
01
Complete the registration form below
02
Click the confirmation link in your e-mail to verify your identity
03
Start reviewing: receive Marbles aligned with your expertise
01
Complete the registration form below
02
Click the confirmation link in your e-mail to verify your identity
03
Start reviewing: receive Marbles aligned with your expertise
01
Complete the registration form below
02
Click the confirmation link in your e-mail to verify your identity
03
Start reviewing: receive Marbles aligned with your expertise
01
Complete the registration form below
02
Click the confirmation link in your e-mail to verify your identity
03
Receive Marbles aligned with your expertise and start reviewing!
01
Complete the registration form below
02
Click the confirmation link in your e-mail to verify your identity
03
Start reviewing: receive Marbles aligned with your expertise


How reviews work
How reviews work
Marbles are assigned based on expertise and sent via email to selected reviewers from our community in a double-blind process.
Reviewers accept the task and provide feedback by the set deadline, which is then submitted to authors for revision.
Reviews can be collaborative: they can be signed by several authors, ensuring everyone's work is recognized.
After approval, feedback and reviewer names are published along with the Marble, but remain unlinked to ensure objective criticism and transparency, while recognizing the reviewer’s contribution.
Marbles are assigned based on expertise and sent via email to selected reviewers from our community in a double-blind process.
Reviewers accept the task and provide feedback by the set deadline, which is then submitted to authors for revision.
Reviews can be collaborative: they can be signed by several authors, ensuring everyone's work is recognized.
After approval, feedback and reviewer names are published along with the Marble, but remain unlinked to ensure objective criticism and transparency, while recognizing the reviewer’s contribution.
Marbles are assigned based on expertise and sent via email to selected reviewers from our community in a double-blind process.
Reviewers accept the task and provide feedback by the set deadline, which is then submitted to authors for revision.
Reviews can be collaborative: they can be signed by several authors, ensuring everyone's work is recognized.
After approval, feedback and reviewer names are published along with the Marble, but remain unlinked to ensure objective criticism and transparency, while recognizing the reviewer’s contribution.
Marbles are assigned based on expertise and sent via email to selected reviewers from our community in a double-blind process.
Reviewers accept the task and provide feedback by the set deadline, which is then submitted to authors for revision.
Reviews can be collaborative: they can be signed by several authors, ensuring everyone's work is recognized.
After approval, feedback and reviewer names are published along with the Marble, but remain unlinked to ensure objective criticism and transparency, while recognizing the reviewer’s contribution.
Marbles are assigned based on expertise and sent via email to selected reviewers from our community in a double-blind process.
Reviewers accept the task and provide feedback by the set deadline, which is then submitted to authors for revision.
Reviews can be collaborative: they can be signed by several authors, ensuring everyone's work is recognized.
After approval, feedback and reviewer names are published along with the Marble, but remain unlinked to ensure objective criticism and transparency, while recognizing the reviewer’s contribution.